From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16826 invoked by alias); 24 Mar 2004 23:11:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 16791 invoked from network); 24 Mar 2004 23:11:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hawaii.kealia.com) (209.3.10.89) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 24 Mar 2004 23:11:35 -0000 Received: by hawaii.kealia.com (Postfix, from userid 2049) id B929BCA89; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 15:11:25 -0800 (PST) To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: TUI == ? References: <406214B6.6070007@gnu.org> From: David Carlton Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 01:49:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <406214B6.6070007@gnu.org> (Andrew Cagney's message of "Wed, 24 Mar 2004 18:07:34 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) XEmacs/21.4 (Reasonable Discussion, linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg00243.txt.bz2 On Wed, 24 Mar 2004 18:07:34 -0500, Andrew Cagney said: > Ok, quick vote time. TUI stands for: > "Text User Interface" > "Terminal User Interface" I really don't have a strong opinion at all, but I would vote for option 2 - the regular cli is also a text user interface, and the tui outputs escape codes which don't seem to me like text but do seem to me like a terminal-ish thing. David Carlton carlton@kealia.com