From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21160 invoked by alias); 8 Jan 2004 00:50:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 21133 invoked from network); 8 Jan 2004 00:50:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hawaii.kealia.com) (209.3.10.89) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 8 Jan 2004 00:50:04 -0000 Received: by hawaii.kealia.com (Postfix, from userid 2049) id 2E9FEC6CB; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 16:50:04 -0800 (PST) To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com, Jim Blandy , Elena Zannoni Subject: Re: GDB 6.1 branch end jan? References: <3FFC98E8.8010001@gnu.org> From: David Carlton Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 00:50:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <3FFC98E8.8010001@gnu.org> (Andrew Cagney's message of "Wed, 07 Jan 2004 18:40:24 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) XEmacs/21.4 (Rational FORTRAN, linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg00077.txt.bz2 On Wed, 07 Jan 2004 18:40:24 -0500, Andrew Cagney said: > According to the release schedule: > http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/schedule/ > GDB 6.1 is ment to branch sometime in January. Now that the SPARC > rewrite has been merged (and SPARC is looking really healthy, go > mark!) its time to come up with a more concrete set of dates. Let's > try: > ~branch 2004-01-31 > ~release 2004-03-15 We're at an unfortunate state in my C++ work right now - I'm still waiting for symtab approval for , and frankly there are more patches that would ideally go in after that. I'm not saying that the above dates are impossible, but it would be nice if that patch got looked at soon... David Carlton carlton@kealia.com