From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6044 invoked by alias); 21 Jun 2004 23:22:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 6023 invoked from network); 21 Jun 2004 23:22:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nwkea-mail-1.sun.com) (192.18.42.13) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 21 Jun 2004 23:22:30 -0000 Received: from sfbaymail2sca.sfbay.sun.com ([129.145.155.42]) by nwkea-mail-1.sun.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i5LNMIJ6018731; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 16:22:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kealia.sfbay.sun.com (kealia.SFBay.Sun.COM [129.144.80.16]) by sfbaymail2sca.sfbay.sun.com (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.10/ENSMAIL,v2.2) with ESMTP id i5LNMHWG005869; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 16:22:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by kealia.sfbay.sun.com (Postfix, from userid 2049) id 13118C0F0; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 16:22:17 -0700 (PDT) To: Jim Blandy Cc: gdb-discuss@gnu.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [Gdb-discuss] Should we close down gdb-discuss@gnu.org? References: From: David Carlton Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 23:22:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Jim Blandy's message of "Mon, 21 Jun 2004 17:11:41 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Reasonable Discussion, linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2004-06/txt/msg00219.txt.bz2 On Mon, 21 Jun 2004 17:11:41 -0500, Jim Blandy said: > I can understand the advantage of having a list other than gdb@ to > carry non-technical discussions. But I'm not sure that outweighs > the disadvantage of being confusing to newcomers to GDB. > What do people think? The issues that led to the creation of gdb-discuss@ are still unresolved. I don't see there being a great need for gdb-discuss@ once they have been resolved, but I would lean towards leaving the list in place until that happens. Having said that, I don't have a strong opinion on the matter - I'm not actively participating in gdb-related issues these days, after all. David Carlton david.carlton@sun.com