From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30204 invoked by alias); 18 Feb 2004 00:20:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 30193 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2004 00:20:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hawaii.kealia.com) (209.3.10.89) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 18 Feb 2004 00:20:49 -0000 Received: by hawaii.kealia.com (Postfix, from userid 2049) id 8F730CDF9; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 09:24:30 -0800 (PST) To: mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain) Cc: drow@mvista.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Foo References: <20040217022008.24CA64B104@berman.michael-chastain.com> From: David Carlton Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 00:20:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20040217022008.24CA64B104@berman.michael-chastain.com> (Michael Elizabeth Chastain's message of "Mon, 16 Feb 2004 21:20:08 -0500 (EST)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) XEmacs/21.4 (Reasonable Discussion, linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2004-02/txt/msg00219.txt.bz2 On Mon, 16 Feb 2004 21:20:08 -0500 (EST), mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain) said: > The second template parameter is a "char *"; a value, not a type. > gcc 3.3.2 -gstabs+ emits this: > .stabs "Foo:Tt(1,1)=..." > gcc HEAD -gstabs+ just changed to emit this: > .stabs "Foo:Tt(0,25)=..." > Do we care? I think the "(char*)(&string)" looks ugly but is legal. > I want to change templates.exp to accept this as a PASS. Sounds good to me. David Carlton carlton@kealia.com