From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13033 invoked by alias); 24 Jan 2004 00:04:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 13021 invoked from network); 24 Jan 2004 00:04:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hawaii.kealia.com) (209.3.10.89) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 24 Jan 2004 00:04:03 -0000 Received: by hawaii.kealia.com (Postfix, from userid 2049) id 65ABBC6D1; Fri, 23 Jan 2004 16:04:03 -0800 (PST) To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: GDB 6.1 branch end jan? References: <3FFC98E8.8010001@gnu.org> <4011AEB3.2010405@gnu.org> From: David Carlton Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2004 00:04:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <4011AEB3.2010405@gnu.org> (Andrew Cagney's message of "Fri, 23 Jan 2004 18:30:59 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) XEmacs/21.4 (Rational FORTRAN, linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg00282.txt.bz2 On Fri, 23 Jan 2004 18:30:59 -0500, Andrew Cagney said: > Looking at my rate of change with TUI, and knowing I'm off line the > next two weekends, and looking at the IBM stuff, and steady progress > on other fronts, I think I'll slip this two weeks vis: > branch 2004-02-14 > release 2004-03-30 That should be fine from my point of view. Elena and Daniel have been really responsive (thanks!), and I've been able to steal enough time from my primary duties at work that I should be able to generate the last few important patches in time for the 6.1 branch (never mind the release). David Carlton carlton@kealia.com