From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-16615-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 6985 invoked by alias); 15 Dec 2003 23:17:36 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 6963 invoked from network); 15 Dec 2003 23:17:35 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO hawaii.kealia.com) (209.3.10.89)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 15 Dec 2003 23:17:35 -0000
Received: by hawaii.kealia.com (Postfix, from userid 2049)
	id A72A6C6C3; Mon, 15 Dec 2003 15:17:33 -0800 (PST)
To: Ian Lance Taylor <ian@wasabisystems.com>
Cc: gdb <gdb@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: new demangler
References: <yf2llpdvgko.fsf@hawaii.kealia.com>
	<20031215225452.GA23169@nevyn.them.org>
	<yf2he01vg6z.fsf@hawaii.kealia.com> <m3y8tdfzir.fsf@gossamer.airs.com>
From: David Carlton <carlton@kealia.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 23:17:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <m3y8tdfzir.fsf@gossamer.airs.com> (Ian Lance Taylor's message
 of "15 Dec 2003 18:10:36 -0500")
Message-ID: <yf2d6apvfg2.fsf@hawaii.kealia.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) XEmacs/21.4 (Rational FORTRAN, linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-SW-Source: 2003-12/txt/msg00222.txt.bz2

On 15 Dec 2003 18:10:36 -0500, Ian Lance Taylor <ian@wasabisystems.com> said:

> `maint demangle' only works for me when I explicitly run gdb on a
> C++ program.  When I do specify a C++ program, it appears to work
> correctly.

Ah, I see.  Now I'm getting it to work correctly with 'maint
demangle', too.

So is there a problem with the way class_name_from_physname invokes
the demangler?  It does this:

  char *demangled_name = cplus_demangle (physname, DMGL_ANSI);

Compared to other places in GDB where the demangler is called, this is
unusual since DMGL_PARAMS isn't passed in as well, but I don't see why
that would cause the demangling to fail completely.

David Carlton
carlton@kealia.com