From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10470 invoked by alias); 21 Jan 2009 12:00:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 10449 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Jan 2009 12:00:23 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_05 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from smarthost.piip.TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (HELO smarthost.TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE) (129.70.137.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 12:00:19 +0000 Received: from manam.TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (manam.TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE [129.70.137.47]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smarthost.TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A3A4482B1; Wed, 21 Jan 2009 13:00:16 +0100 (CET) To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, gdb@sourceware.org Subject: Re: DWARF register numbering discrepancy on SPARC between GCC and GDB References: <20090121110847.GU5709@adacore.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.106) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Rainer Orth Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 12:00:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: Joel Brobecker's message of "Wed, 21 Jan 2009 15:08:47 +0400" Message-ID: Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-01/txt/msg00139.txt.bz2 Joel Brobecker writes: > However, when I tried to find some kind of official document > to confirm this numbering, I only found: > > http://wikis.sun.com/display/SunStudio/Dwarf+Register+Numbering > > This is a wiki page, so I'm not sure how much we can trust the contents. > However, it does contradict the numbers above: Apparently DBX expects > f0-f31 to be numbered 32-63, not 40-71. If that information is correct, > perhaps Sun changed it since the first implementation in SDB? Does > anyone have maybe a more affirmative document? I'd suggest asking on tools-compilers@opensolaris.org where several Sun compiler developers hang around. An alternative is the Sun Studio Tools Forums at http://forums.sun.com/forum.jspa?forumID=852 although I find that forum stuff inconvenient to use compared to true mailing lists. Rainer -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rainer Orth, Faculty of Technology, Bielefeld University