From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id ERtnH+W2CWRmxAkAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 09 Mar 2023 05:37:25 -0500 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 74FCC1E223; Thu, 9 Mar 2023 05:37:25 -0500 (EST) Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE header.i=@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20200306 header.b=AjQL4v6G; dkim-atps=neutral X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, RDNS_DYNAMIC,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Received: from sourceware.org (ip-8-43-85-97.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06A5F1E110 for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2023 05:37:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 077C33850225 for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2023 10:37:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (smtp.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE [129.70.160.84]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A0173858022 for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2023 10:37:05 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 5A0173858022 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (Postfix) with ESMTP id 437DC61651; Thu, 9 Mar 2023 11:37:04 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE Received: from smtp.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gxF0oSHDIjAk; Thu, 9 Mar 2023 11:37:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from manam.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (p50855b0c.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.133.91.12]) (Authenticated sender: ro) by smtp.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4A29A615E4; Thu, 9 Mar 2023 11:37:03 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE; s=20200306; t=1678358223; bh=aRsaZwWsAwKssChBtTgZvkmBaEt4rtNnCb4uYB9fEAM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=AjQL4v6GWeRk1hw3g+T46jjkJCvDlYIQyOTmlj/8uoQ/XmELJO2ic163kP87KukNx mwNiSooq8SVX4/nV5NDhokde/V3x5McaSVLqjAjcjRlYEXXDPPJOBqwHRDpE0oIXHX 4ENskVb7IhjhVK0xqGtkIJuNExM9SQXlxhN6xpfpsfAbG19Ji5PfAaFdSYi8y0wm0S UOQ9rbdpQWc3aRXSeoYrPjLxc20E1N29/EdCOs5asuyNd3npGm1NnbDOspeQQtkX4S 4DRLJsNyTEI1+ADVdwPyZayU8Y0WTlqotAn/bE9UTBSWkJ9xjgwwbzOZvB76wE6uQz mOwNLCjlhYNTg== From: Rainer Orth To: Andreas Schwab Cc: Nemo Nusquam via Gdb , Nemo Nusquam Subject: Re: Unable to build GDB 13.1 on Solaris 11.3 Sparc References: Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2023 11:37:02 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Andreas Schwab's message of "Thu, 09 Mar 2023 09:08:16 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1.90 (usg-unix-v) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: gdb@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: gdb-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb" Andreas Schwab writes: > On M=C3=A4r 08 2023, Rainer Orth wrote: > >> If you're building from the gdb 13.1 tarball, you can omit those. Btw., >> --disable-binutils is harmful: gdb depends on libbfd and won't link >> without, as you've discovered. > > --disable-binutils does not disable building bfd (binutils is just > another consumer of bfd, like gdb), and will not do any harm. True, sorry for the confusion. However, my point stands: none of those --disable-* options are needed when building from a tarball, and keeping configure lines as simple as possible unless proven otherwise has more often than not proven to help things. It's only when you build from a git checkout that they help reduce build time, but still aren't strictly necessary. Rainer --=20 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------= -- Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University