From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-41766-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 28143 invoked by alias); 30 Jan 2013 14:56:34 -0000
Received: (qmail 28107 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Jan 2013 14:56:32 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP,RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from snape.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (HELO smtp-relay.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE) (129.70.160.84)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 14:56:22 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE [127.0.0.1])	by smtp-relay.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D66266D;	Wed, 30 Jan 2013 15:56:20 +0100 (CET)
Received: from smtp-relay.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE ([127.0.0.1])	by localhost (malfoy.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)	with LMTP id FjclZdlfF1sf; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 15:56:19 +0100 (CET)
Received: from lokon.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (lokon.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE [129.70.161.110])	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))	(No client certificate requested)	by smtp-relay.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E96166C;	Wed, 30 Jan 2013 15:56:19 +0100 (CET)
Received: (from ro@localhost)	by lokon.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (8.14.5+Sun/8.14.5/Submit) id r0UEuIvU013363;	Wed, 30 Jan 2013 15:56:18 +0100 (MET)
From: Rainer Orth <ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
To: Kai Tietz <ktietz70@googlemail.com>
Cc: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@google.com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,        Binutils <binutils@sourceware.org>, gdb <gdb@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [patch libiberty's include]: Fixes PR 39064 and partial PR 54620
References: <CAEwic4b+9OehgfoEy3WCZbpFqpzqSXxewAc8rCL1HRf=OsGsMQ@mail.gmail.com>	<CAKOQZ8xVJecJKHEucOjcptHGNDt_ptx_t=OW9RrUT0F8qLM=zg@mail.gmail.com>	<CAEwic4ZAr1krhH3b=MbsM4f1RKqZJUz4UiTmUubk-Vhrtd74nw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 14:56:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <CAEwic4ZAr1krhH3b=MbsM4f1RKqZJUz4UiTmUubk-Vhrtd74nw@mail.gmail.com>	(Kai Tietz's message of "Wed, 30 Jan 2013 15:48:30 +0100")
Message-ID: <ydd38xi67ot.fsf@lokon.CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.92 (usg-unix-v)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2013-01/txt/msg00086.txt.bz2

Kai Tietz <ktietz70@googlemail.com> writes:

> Yes, this is a valid point.  The (u)int??_t types aren't necessarily
> declared by including sys/types.h.  So what's about the following
> patch.  If stdint.h header is present, then we should include it and
> then we can assume that the (u)int??_t types are present.

This is wrong: <stdint.h> provides e.g. uint32_t, but not u_int32_t.
The latter is a BSDism.

	Rainer

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University