From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12546 invoked by alias); 18 Apr 2012 20:37:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 12410 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Apr 2012 20:37:42 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 20:37:29 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q3IKbBe1020984 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 18 Apr 2012 16:37:11 -0400 Received: from fche.csb (vpn-8-181.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.8.181]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q3IKbA98012860; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 16:37:10 -0400 Received: by fche.csb (Postfix, from userid 2569) id C62A55816A; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 16:37:09 -0400 (EDT) To: Cc: , , , , , Subject: Re: Will therefore GDB utilize C++ or not? References: <20120416065456.GA30097@host2.jankratochvil.net> <4F8ECB72.70708@redhat.com> <20120418151553.GA16768@host2.jankratochvil.net> <4F8EDD7B.2010602@redhat.com> <20120418155354.GA17912@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20120418160644.GC25623@adacore.com> <20120418161315.GC18303@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20120418162255.GD25623@adacore.com> <4F8EEC55.7080008@oarcorp.com> <4F8EF0BB.4070405@redhat.com> <20120418165702.GE25623@adacore.com> <09787EF419216C41A903FD14EE5506DD0313F18196@AUSX7MCPC103.AMER.DELL.COM> From: fche@redhat.com (Frank Ch. Eigler) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 20:37:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <09787EF419216C41A903FD14EE5506DD0313F18196@AUSX7MCPC103.AMER.DELL.COM> (Paul Koning's message of "Wed, 18 Apr 2012 12:39:26 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-04/txt/msg00144.txt.bz2 writes: > Same here. A NetBSD system with 128 MB of memory (there is more > elsewhere, but not for that OS or for its processes). Gdbserver is > a wonderful tool [...] It's already pushing the limits (300k or so when > linked statically). Has there been some experimentation performed to produce evidence that a C++ized gdbserver would be substantially larger? - FChE