From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14697 invoked by alias); 11 Apr 2002 23:00:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 14656 invoked by uid 22784); 11 Apr 2002 23:00:04 -0000 From: DJ Delorie Newsgroups: cygnus.gdb Subject: Re: Why autoconf 2.13? Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 16:00:00 -0000 Organization: Red Hat, Inc Message-ID: References: <200204110039.g3B0dCT03033@fred.ninemoons.com> <87lmbtoq9r.fsf@creche.redhat.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: cse.sfbay.redhat.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: cronkite.cygnus.com 1018565187 13655 205.180.230.236 (11 Apr 2002 22:46:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: postmaster@cygnus.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 11 Apr 2002 22:46:27 GMT User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 To: gdb@sources.redhat.com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup cygnus.gdb X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00187.txt.bz2 Tom Tromey writes: > Doing it will let us use a newer automake, which in turn will let us > remove a bunch of hacks from various Makefile.am's. Also it will mean > that libgcj won't need to continue using its own hacked automake. The > big problem is just that nobody with the expertise has the time (or > maybe interest :-). Have they fixed the problem with old config.caches in 2.5 yet?