From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27160 invoked by alias); 29 Jan 2003 21:56:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 27153 invoked from network); 29 Jan 2003 21:55:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO zenia.red-bean.com) (66.244.67.22) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 29 Jan 2003 21:55:59 -0000 Received: from zenia.red-bean.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by zenia.red-bean.com (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h0TLoJ8A024416; Wed, 29 Jan 2003 16:50:19 -0500 Received: (from jimb@localhost) by zenia.red-bean.com (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id h0TLoIeh024412; Wed, 29 Jan 2003 16:50:18 -0500 To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: Andrew Cagney , gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [Various] obsoleting the annotate level 2 interface References: From: Jim Blandy Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 21:56:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2.92 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00501.txt.bz2 Ulrich Drepper writes: > On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Andrew Cagney wrote: > > > We may also want to print out the fact that level two annotations are > > deprecated. > > IMHO, it definitely needs to be stated in a very visible place that > level-2 annotations are deprecated. But I think it's more important to > work on what's missing in MI, because it should be clear that as it > currently stands, MI is not a complete solution to a GDB front end. It was in NEWS. We could add a warning to the "set annotation" command, I guess.