From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13761 invoked by alias); 18 Sep 2003 23:12:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 13754 invoked from network); 18 Sep 2003 23:12:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO zenia.home) (12.223.225.216) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 18 Sep 2003 23:12:35 -0000 Received: by zenia.home (Postfix, from userid 5433) id C92B520758; Thu, 18 Sep 2003 18:09:52 -0500 (EST) To: Andrew Cagney Cc: "Neal E. Coombes" , gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: dbxread.c:1771: internal-error: sect_index_data not initialized References: <3F687799.5050201@trdlnk.com> <3F68A535.8010609@redhat.com> <3F6A3858.6010609@redhat.com> From: Jim Blandy Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 23:12:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <3F6A3858.6010609@redhat.com> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-09/txt/msg00235.txt.bz2 Andrew Cagney writes: > > Andrew Cagney writes: > > > >> > This has already been reported and fixed, but the fix was too late to > >> > be included in 6.0. > > > >> In July? > > The reporter said it worked for him in July, but I didn't commit the > > patch to the trunk until Sep 8, so it didn't get the exercise needed > > for inclusion on the branch. > > Since I'm waiting on some FSF admin stuff I unfroze the branch. With > some real use under its belt, the patch might now be ready? Ten days? I don't think it's a very high-risk patch; it should be fine.