From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27738 invoked by alias); 29 Jan 2003 21:58:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 27730 invoked from network); 29 Jan 2003 21:58:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO zenia.red-bean.com) (66.244.67.22) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 29 Jan 2003 21:58:05 -0000 Received: from zenia.red-bean.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by zenia.red-bean.com (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h0TLqR8A024425; Wed, 29 Jan 2003 16:52:27 -0500 Received: (from jimb@localhost) by zenia.red-bean.com (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id h0TLqRfg024421; Wed, 29 Jan 2003 16:52:27 -0500 To: Andrew Cagney Cc: Nick Roberts , rms@gnu.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: obsoleting the annotate level 2 interface References: <15917.39229.935851.920452@nick.uklinux.net> <15927.12416.601404.240113@nick.uklinux.net> <3E376929.3060102@redhat.com> From: Jim Blandy Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 21:58:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <3E376929.3060102@redhat.com> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2.92 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00502.txt.bz2 Nick Clifton writes: > > Also gdb-ui.el probably doesn't need all the annotations. If you lost some key > > ones (frames-invalid and breakpoints-invalid, for example) would this make it > > easier to maintain? > > Can you wind the code back to level-one annotations? Remember, it is > level-two annotations that are causing all the grief? Well, gdb-ui provides a breakpoint window, a displays window, a local variables window,etc. Level one just gives you enough to put an arrow in the source code.