From: Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>
To: Faheem Mitha <faheem@email.unc.edu>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: setfault calling functions within gdb
Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2002 23:49:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <vt2ofb6xsf5.fsf@zenia.red-bean.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0209092345270.13388-100000@Chrestomanci>
I don't see anything obviously wrong with what you're doing (although
someone is certain to pop up and correct me). Could you file this as
a bug report at http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/bugs/, so it won't get
lost?
Faheem Mitha <faheem@email.unc.edu> writes:
> Dear People,
>
> I'm having problems calling functions from within gdb. Can someone tell me
> what I am doing wrong? Consider the following innocuous program
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------
> #include<vector>
> #include <iostream>
>
> using std::vector;
> using std::cout;
>
> typedef vector<double> Point;
> void print(Point pt);
>
> int main()
> {
> Point foo(3,1.0);
> //print(foo);
> }
>
> void print(Point pt)
> {
> unsigned int i;
> cout << "[";
> for(i=0; i < pt.size(); i++)
> {
> cout << pt[i];
> cout << ",";
> }
> cout << "]";
> }
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> When I set a breakpoint after the definition of foo and call
> print(foo) I get a segfault. There appears to be nothing wrong with
> this function, since print(foo) when compiled into the function works
> as expected. Also, "print foo[0]" works fine. There seem to be two
> possibilities; a) I am doing something wrong, b) this is a bug in
> gdb. I'm hoping it is the former. I dimly recall calling functions
> successfully sometime in the past, but I can't remember whether it was
> in C or C++ code.
>
> Any help would be greatly appreciated. This is really frustrating!
> Output from gdb follows. I'm using gdb, gcc-3.0 on Debian Sarge. The
> respective versions are
>
> ii gdb 5.2.cvs20020401-6 The GNU Debugger
> ii g++-3.0 3.0.4-9 The GNU C++ compiler.
>
> I locally compiled the slightly more recent version of gdb from August
> which is in unstable, but I get the same behaviour.
>
> Faheem.
>
> (gdb) call print(foo)
> [
> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> 0x0804a1a4 in print(std::vector<double, std::allocator<double> >)
> (pt=0x804f008) at test.cc:22
> The program being debugged was signaled while in a function called
> >From GDB.
> GDB remains in the frame where the signal was received.
> To change this behavior use "set unwindonsignal on"
> Evaluation of the expression containing the function
> (print(std::vector<double, std::allocator<double> >)) will be
> abandoned.
> (gdb)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-09-10 6:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-09-09 20:58 Faheem Mitha
2002-09-09 23:49 ` Jim Blandy [this message]
2002-09-10 20:12 ` Faheem Mitha
2002-09-10 6:27 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=vt2ofb6xsf5.fsf@zenia.red-bean.com \
--to=jimb@redhat.com \
--cc=faheem@email.unc.edu \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox