From: Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>
To: David Carlton <carlton@math.stanford.edu>
Cc: Daniel Berlin <dberlin@dberlin.org>,
Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>,
gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: suggestion for dictionary representation
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 20:01:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <vt2it0uiy68.fsf@zenia.red-bean.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ro1hegfqre1.fsf@jackfruit.Stanford.EDU>
David Carlton <carlton@math.stanford.edu> writes:
> And it's entirely reasonable to think of 'N' as a constant. Or
> perhaps two constants: one for C programs with short names, one for
> C++ programs with long names. (And I'm not really sure that the C++
> names will ultimately turn out to be that much longer: once the proper
> namespace support has been added, then looking up a C++ name will
> probably be a multistep process (looking up pieces of the demangled
> name in turn), and for each those steps, we'll be looking at a name
> that will be of the appropriate length for a C program.)
Actually, the insanely long symbol names I've seen have to do with
template abuse, not deeply nested namespaces. I'm not free to post
the example I have in mind, but I'm pretty sure you'd be disgusted.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-09-25 3:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-09-22 19:59 Jim Blandy
2002-09-22 20:11 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-09-23 10:38 ` David Carlton
2002-09-23 17:34 ` Daniel Berlin
2002-09-23 18:39 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-09-23 21:28 ` Daniel Berlin
2002-09-23 21:38 ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-09-23 21:44 ` Daniel Berlin
2002-09-23 21:47 ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-09-23 21:54 ` Daniel Berlin
2002-09-24 9:33 ` David Carlton
2002-09-24 10:42 ` Daniel Berlin
2002-09-24 10:53 ` David Carlton
2002-09-24 20:01 ` Jim Blandy [this message]
2002-09-24 20:50 ` Daniel Berlin
2002-09-23 18:28 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-09-24 3:51 ` Paul N. Hilfinger
2002-09-24 19:52 ` Jim Blandy
2002-09-24 20:37 ` Elena Zannoni
2002-09-24 20:53 ` Daniel Berlin
2002-09-23 23:50 Jim Blandy
2002-09-24 6:19 ` Daniel Berlin
2002-09-24 7:06 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-09-24 21:01 ` Jim Blandy
2002-09-25 5:54 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-09-27 11:23 ` Jim Blandy
2002-09-27 11:28 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-09-24 9:49 ` David Carlton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=vt2it0uiy68.fsf@zenia.red-bean.com \
--to=jimb@redhat.com \
--cc=carlton@math.stanford.edu \
--cc=dberlin@dberlin.org \
--cc=drow@mvista.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox