From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6578 invoked by alias); 4 Aug 2004 21:35:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 6569 invoked from network); 4 Aug 2004 21:35:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 4 Aug 2004 21:35:43 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i74LZhe1025994 for ; Wed, 4 Aug 2004 17:35:43 -0400 Received: from zenia.home.redhat.com (porkchop.devel.redhat.com [172.16.58.2]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i74LZfa18340; Wed, 4 Aug 2004 17:35:42 -0400 To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: interface to partial support for DW_OP_piece in dwarf2expr.[ch] References: <4111145F.7000504@gnu.org> <41112BAE.9080304@gnu.org> From: Jim Blandy Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2004 21:35:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <41112BAE.9080304@gnu.org> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2004-08/txt/msg00047.txt.bz2 Andrew Cagney writes: > > Andrew Cagney writes: > > > >>> I'm just having trouble getting my head around how this will affect > >>> core-gdb, and seeing how this addresses our need to meet GCC 3.5's > >>> requirements? > >>> Can we expand on that? > > ? I answered this. The dwarf2.expr.h change I posted doesn't get into GCC 3.5's requirements, and it shouldn't. It's just meant to allow dwarf2expr.[ch] to return the results of the computation it did; it's up to its caller what to do with that.