From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-19034-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 31262 invoked by alias); 11 Aug 2004 20:31:34 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 31253 invoked from network); 11 Aug 2004 20:31:33 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 11 Aug 2004 20:31:33 -0000
Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i7BKVXe1023868
	for <gdb@sources.redhat.com>; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 16:31:33 -0400
Received: from zenia.home.redhat.com (porkchop.devel.redhat.com [172.16.58.2])
	by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i7BKVWa21310;
	Wed, 11 Aug 2004 16:31:32 -0400
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: interface to partial support for DW_OP_piece in dwarf2expr.[ch]
References: <vt2fz743d9h.fsf@zenia.home> <4111145F.7000504@gnu.org>
	<vt2fz7292z3 dot fsf at zenia dot home> <41112BAE dot 9080304 at gnu
	dot org> <vt2hdri4mi1 dot fsf at zenia dot home> <41115B4F dot 1080700
	at gnu dot org> <vt2pt66zgul dot fsf at zenia dot home>
	<20040804230242 dot GA10332 at nevyn dot them dot org>
	<vt2wu0ejy1q.fsf@zenia.home>
	<200408050952.i759qXFK010181@juw15.nfra.nl>
	<vt2llgtd5h6.fsf@zenia.home>
	<9787-Fri06Aug2004123633+0300-eliz@gnu.org>
	<vt2d61yrcse.fsf@zenia.home>
From: Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 20:31:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <vt2d61yrcse.fsf@zenia.home>
Message-ID: <vt2fz6th12i.fsf@zenia.home>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-SW-Source: 2004-08/txt/msg00181.txt.bz2


Dan, does that patch correctly implement the suggestions in this
message:

    http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2003-05/msg00431.html

?

The answer doesn't bear directly on the central question in this
thread; whether I correctly understood Dan's suggestions from a year
ago doesn't really affect whether an arch-specific piece simplifier is
a good thing to do today.  I'm just looking for a sanity check on
whether I properly understood what was requested.