From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4183 invoked by alias); 6 Jul 2004 17:22:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 4151 invoked from network); 6 Jul 2004 17:22:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 6 Jul 2004 17:22:12 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i66HMCe1014173 for ; Tue, 6 Jul 2004 13:22:12 -0400 Received: from zenia.home.redhat.com (porkchop.devel.redhat.com [172.16.58.2]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i66HMA019238; Tue, 6 Jul 2004 13:22:10 -0400 To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: mec.gnu@mindspring.com (Michael Elizabeth Chastain), gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Delay the branch for E500 native support References: <20040703114543.71C864B104@berman.michael-chastain.com> <2914-Sun04Jul2004001640+0300-eliz@gnu.org> From: Jim Blandy Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2004 17:22:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <2914-Sun04Jul2004001640+0300-eliz@gnu.org> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2004-07/txt/msg00044.txt.bz2 For what it's worth, I actually like feature-based scheduling, too. It's inconsistent of me to suggest a delay. I think my real motivation was just frustration: I've put, what, 45 patches in on this thing so far, and I really wanted to just get it done. I don't see any compelling reason to delay the branch. I'll get everything onto the trunk, and we can see what people think.