From: Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>
To: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, gdb@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [rfc] debugging anonymous unions
Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 02:48:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <vt27k1i7etb.fsf@zenia.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031128215759.GA31439@twiddle.net>
In principle, having the debug info reflect the structure of the code
is a good thing. But I can't see what it buys us in this case, over
simply emitting all the (effectively) top-level members as separate
variables, whose locations happen to overlap. Is there anything
interesting you can think of that GDB could do only if it knew there
was an anonymous union involved?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-11-30 2:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-11-28 21:58 Richard Henderson
2003-11-30 2:48 ` Jim Blandy [this message]
2003-11-30 20:43 ` Richard Henderson
2003-12-01 0:01 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=vt27k1i7etb.fsf@zenia.home \
--to=jimb@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gdb@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox