From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8699 invoked by alias); 13 Jun 2003 20:32:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 8673 invoked from network); 13 Jun 2003 20:32:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO zenia.home) (12.223.225.216) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 13 Jun 2003 20:32:12 -0000 Received: by zenia.home (Postfix, from userid 5433) id 6BD3C20D85; Fri, 13 Jun 2003 15:32:31 -0500 (EST) To: "Theodore A. Roth" Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Function addresses on the AVR References: From: Jim Blandy Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 20:32:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-06/txt/msg00266.txt.bz2 "Theodore A. Roth" writes: > I've changed the ADDRESS_TO_POINTER and POINTER_TO_ADDRESS methods to > do the bit shift for code addrs and removed the > CONVERT_FROM_FUNC_PTR_ADDR method. I can't see that it negatively > affects either what is in cvs or the new code I'm working on > (frame-ifying the avr), so it looks like your analysis is correct. > > I'll commit the changes after I've done a bit more testing (I still > don't have the testsuite running for avr yet :-\ ). That will remove > one more instance of CONVERT_FROM_FUNC_PTR_ADDR for you. Great --- thanks! > Thanks for digging through the avr stuff. No problem!