From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16849 invoked by alias); 1 Jul 2003 22:51:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 16841 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2003 22:51:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO zenia.home) (12.223.225.216) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 1 Jul 2003 22:51:58 -0000 Received: by zenia.home (Postfix, from userid 5433) id 2CECA202BC; Tue, 1 Jul 2003 17:51:38 -0500 (EST) To: Andrew Cagney Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: IBM S/390 prologue analysis revisited References: <3F00DC8C.5040908@redhat.com> From: Jim Blandy Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2003 22:51:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <3F00DC8C.5040908@redhat.com> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2003-07/txt/msg00027.txt.bz2 Andrew Cagney writes: > You mean: [just for the record]: new prologue analyzer for S/390 > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2003-04/msg00352.html Yes, that's it. > I thought the conclusion was that it could/should go in anyway. I had been hoping folks from IBM would say something... :(