From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9052 invoked by alias); 22 Feb 2007 04:09:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 9044 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Feb 2007 04:09:31 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from heller.inter.net.il (HELO heller.inter.net.il) (213.8.233.23) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Feb 2007 04:09:26 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([81.5.48.28]) by heller.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3a-GA) with ESMTP id BXW27911 (AUTH halo1); Thu, 22 Feb 2007 06:09:15 +0200 (IST) Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 12:27:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: Michael Snyder CC: lerele@champenstudios.com, khaledjmal@yahoo.fr, gdb@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <1172088151.9824.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> (message from Michael Snyder on Wed, 21 Feb 2007 12:02:31 -0800) Subject: Re: i386 gdbserver for windows: break problem Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20070221170543.14860.qmail@web26306.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <45DC8C8C.6040007@champenstudios.com> <1172088151.9824.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-02/txt/msg00230.txt.bz2 > From: Michael Snyder > Cc: Khaled Jmal , gdb@sourceware.org > Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 12:02:31 -0800 > > Control-c has always been problematic for gdb on windows. > Windows doesn't treat control-c at all like other os's do. Actually, Ctrl-C handling on Windows is very similar to Posix. The only major problem that I'm aware of is that the Ctrl-C handler runs in a separate thread, so a single-threaded program suddenly becomes multi-threaded, and in particular one can have race condition between the main thread and the signal thread.