From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31088 invoked by alias); 13 Jan 2006 19:43:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 31079 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Jan 2006 19:43:26 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nitzan.inter.net.il (HELO nitzan.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.20) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 19:43:24 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-83-130-206-196.inter.net.il [83.130.206.196]) by nitzan.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) with ESMTP id CLN45510 (AUTH halo1); Fri, 13 Jan 2006 21:39:39 +0200 (IST) Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 19:43:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: Paul Koning , msnyder@redhat.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com, jrydberg@virtutech.com, fche@redhat.com, brolley@redhat.com, ebachalo@redhat.com CC: pkoning@equallogic.com In-reply-to: <20060113160223.GC6770@brasko.net> (message from Bob Rossi on Fri, 13 Jan 2006 11:02:23 -0500) Subject: Re: Return to Reverse Execution Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <43BC376F.4000307@redhat.com> <43BDF1D6.1040807@redhat.com> <17342.35464.445000.474814@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <20060113160223.GC6770@brasko.net> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-01/txt/msg00113.txt.bz2 > Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 11:02:23 -0500 > From: Bob Rossi > Cc: eliz@gnu.org, msnyder@redhat.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com, > jrydberg@virtutech.com, fche@redhat.com, brolley@redhat.com, > ebachalo@redhat.com > > > I'll add my voice to Eli. "Back" is a direction; "reverse" is (in one > > of its meanings) a change of direction. > > Has anyone even considered "Previous", instead of "Back" or "Reverse"? > I mean, Previous/Next go together IMO, just as Backward/Forward go together. For "next", "previous" is indeed a good counterpart. But we were mainly talking about the other commands: step, continue, finish, until, etc.