From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-33914-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 7469 invoked by alias); 4 Mar 2009 22:14:41 -0000
Received: (qmail 7461 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Mar 2009 22:14:41 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.3 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_40,SPF_SOFTFAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mtaout6.012.net.il (HELO mtaout6.012.net.il) (84.95.2.16)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Mar 2009 22:14:34 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.i-mtaout6.012.net.il by i-mtaout6.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0KG0008005R0O500@i-mtaout6.012.net.il> for gdb@sourceware.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2009 00:15:12 +0200 (IST)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.248.57]) by i-mtaout6.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0KG000EDM5TAZPD1@i-mtaout6.012.net.il>; Thu, 05 Mar 2009 00:15:12 +0200 (IST)
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 22:14:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: What about add a interface to output the assembly codes follow	inferior execution
In-reply-to: <e394668d0903041325m516dca91tb8f3ff7ce4bec3a6@mail.gmail.com>
To: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
Cc: pedro@codesourcery.com, gdb@sourceware.org, drow@false.org, teawater@gmail.com
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <uvdqplyuv.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <daef60380903021910w3d4e7f0w76f8b732aaa46c37@mail.gmail.com> <uy6vlm7ga.fsf@gnu.org> <20090304192647.GA21091@caradoc.them.org> <200903041932.04620.pedro@codesourcery.com> <e394668d0903041325m516dca91tb8f3ff7ce4bec3a6@mail.gmail.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-03/txt/msg00046.txt.bz2

> Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 13:25:05 -0800
> From: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
> Cc: gdb@sourceware.org, Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>,         Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, teawater@gmail.com
> 
> Ya, extending the disassemble command makes sense to me.

I don't see how it can make sense that the same command does both
one-time disassembly and disassemble the next source line each time
GDB stops.  It's like "print" and "display" -- it's not an accident we
have 2 different commands there.

If anything, extending "display" with yet another format specifier, or
maybe a qualifier for /i, would make much more sense to me.