From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16560 invoked by alias); 8 Oct 2003 05:54:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 16508 invoked from network); 8 Oct 2003 05:54:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO monty-python.gnu.org) (199.232.76.173) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 8 Oct 2003 05:54:18 -0000 Received: from [207.232.27.5] (helo=WST0054) by monty-python.gnu.org with asmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1A77H4-0003Rv-62; Wed, 08 Oct 2003 01:54:14 -0400 Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2003 05:54:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: Chris Johns CC: michaelstather@nuzi.de,gdb@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <3F835B93.3050303@cybertec.com.au> (message from Chris Johns on Wed, 08 Oct 2003 10:34:27 +1000) Subject: Re: Path handling bug in GDB included with MingW 3.1.0-1 Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <002d01c38b8a$6e2d34f0$2101a8c0@kyromaster> <1438-Tue07Oct2003231328+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> <3F835B93.3050303@cybertec.com.au> X-SW-Source: 2003-10/txt/msg00131.txt.bz2 > Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2003 10:34:27 +1000 > From: Chris Johns > > (gdb) b "c:/p/p.cpp:6" > Breakpoint 1 at 0x4012da: file p.cpp, line 6. > (gdb) b "c:\p\p.cpp:6" > No source file named c:\p\p.cpp. I don't see any problem here, except some syntactic sugar: users of GDB on DOS/Windows systems are well advised to use forward slashes as opposed to backslashes. If commands work with forward slashes, your GDB is fully operational. (The ugly "C:\p/p.cpp" thingie is most probably GCC's fault, anyway.)