From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-16705-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 30327 invoked by alias); 1 Jan 2004 05:59:28 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 30315 invoked from network); 1 Jan 2004 05:59:27 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO monty-python.gnu.org) (199.232.76.173)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 1 Jan 2004 05:59:27 -0000
Received: from [207.232.27.5] (helo=WST0054)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with asmtp (Exim 4.24)
	id 1Abwo7-0006St-PB; Thu, 01 Jan 2004 01:59:48 -0500
Date: Thu, 01 Jan 2004 05:59:00 -0000
Message-Id: <uu13g5hui.fsf@elta.co.il>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@elta.co.il>
To: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
CC: drow@mvista.com,mec.gnu@mindspring.com,gdb@sources.redhat.com
In-reply-to: <3FF3280E.2010407@gnu.org> (message from Andrew Cagney on Wed, 31
	Dec 2003 14:48:30 -0500)
Subject: Re: [commit] Deprecate remaining STREQ uses
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@elta.co.il>
References: <20031215062230.CD6E94B412@berman.michael-chastain.com> <ufzfmy452.fsf@elta.co.il> <20031215155111.GA13947@nevyn.them.org> <ullpd2s0j.fsf@elta.co.il> <3FF3280E.2010407@gnu.org>
X-SW-Source: 2004-01/txt/msg00002.txt.bz2

> Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2003 14:48:30 -0500
> From: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>
> 
> So of the above, only the coff symbol reader is a real risk.

FWIW, I agree with that assessment.