From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8596 invoked by alias); 26 Nov 2005 09:38:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 8588 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Nov 2005 09:38:51 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nitzan.inter.net.il (HELO nitzan.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.20) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 26 Nov 2005 09:38:50 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-203-24.inter.net.il [80.230.203.24]) by nitzan.inter.net.il (MOS 3.6.5-GR) with ESMTP id CAI86612 (AUTH halo1); Sat, 26 Nov 2005 11:38:46 +0200 (IST) Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 15:18:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: gdb@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <20051126000305.GB14956@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> (message from Christopher Faylor on Fri, 25 Nov 2005 19:03:05 -0500) Subject: Re: Maintainer policy for GDB Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20051123195558.GZ1635@adacore.com> <20051124171814.GI1635@adacore.com> <20051125030605.GA20073@nevyn.them.org> <20051125155742.GA29028@nevyn.them.org> <20051126000305.GB14956@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2005-11/txt/msg00575.txt.bz2 > Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 19:03:05 -0500 > From: Christopher Faylor > > How about if an area maintainer hasn't responded, in some way, to > email within a week, the patch is open for a general maintainer to > apply? I'm okay with this, assuming that ``some response'' could be as simple as ``RFA acknowledged, will review it in a week or so''. > Isn't it reasonable to assume that an area maintainer should be reading > gdb-patches on at least a weekly frequency, assuming that they are not > out-of-town? It's reasonable. > I guess you could complicate this with more rules about what to do when > a maintainer responds but doesn't deliver but I don't think we need to > go there for now. No, we don't need to go there before we see this actually happening.