From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17293 invoked by alias); 17 Jun 2005 09:44:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 17272 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Jun 2005 09:44:31 -0000 Received: from legolas.inter.net.il (HELO legolas.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.24) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jun 2005 09:44:30 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-153-6.inter.net.il [80.230.153.6]) by legolas.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.8-GR) with ESMTP id EQD04072 (AUTH halo1); Fri, 17 Jun 2005 12:44:27 +0300 (IDT) Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 09:44:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: gdb@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <20050616190315.GA5572@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Thu, 16 Jun 2005 15:03:15 -0400) Subject: Re: Display libc function names instead of address ? Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <1118892960.12713.5.camel@haypopc> <20050616182936.GA4062@nevyn.them.org> <20050616190315.GA5572@nevyn.them.org> X-SW-Source: 2005-06/txt/msg00181.txt.bz2 > Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 15:03:15 -0400 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > Cc: victor.stinner@haypocalc.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com > > Yes, Windows is not affected by this problem - it's related to shared > libraries and dynamic linking, and Windows DLL linking is different > enough that it does not have this quirk - though I'm sure it has plenty > of its own. Ah, the lights go on: so this problem only happens with dynamically linked programs? If so, that is what I was missing. Thanks for explaining it.