From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14199 invoked by alias); 17 Feb 2006 14:08:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 13917 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Feb 2006 14:08:24 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from romy.inter.net.il (HELO romy.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.66) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 14:08:22 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-10-40.inter.net.il [80.230.10.40]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) with ESMTP id DOV90527 (AUTH halo1); Fri, 17 Feb 2006 16:08:17 +0200 (IST) Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 14:08:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: gdb@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <20060217135451.GA18533@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Fri, 17 Feb 2006 08:54:51 -0500) Subject: Re: MI: type prefixes for values Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <200602171329.34297.ghost@cs.msu.su> <200602171450.16858.ghost@cs.msu.su> <20060217135451.GA18533@nevyn.them.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-02/txt/msg00175.txt.bz2 > Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 08:54:51 -0500 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > > The interesting thing to learn from this conversation, IMO, is that a > frontend is likely to show the type separately from the value. So > maybe we should provide value= and type= if we want to provide both. I'm okay with the two fields approach.