From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-34095-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 9753 invoked by alias); 2 Apr 2009 19:38:55 -0000
Received: (qmail 9745 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Apr 2009 19:38:55 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mtaout5.012.net.il (HELO mtaout5.012.net.il) (84.95.2.13)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Apr 2009 19:38:45 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.i_mtaout5.012.net.il by i_mtaout5.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) id <0KHH00J00NQ0M400@i_mtaout5.012.net.il> for gdb@sourceware.org; Thu, 02 Apr 2009 22:38:28 +0300 (IDT)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.127.171.54]) by i_mtaout5.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) with ESMTPA id <0KHH00KTPNW35HE0@i_mtaout5.012.net.il>; Thu, 02 Apr 2009 22:38:28 +0300 (IDT)
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2009 19:38:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: gdb 7.0: 5 weeks to branch-time...
In-reply-to: <20090402151137.GA24671@caradoc.them.org>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
Cc: brobecker@adacore.com, gdb@sourceware.org
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <uskkqj175.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <20090401215827.GF8930@adacore.com> <u3acrkaap.fsf@gnu.org> <20090402151137.GA24671@caradoc.them.org>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-04/txt/msg00029.txt.bz2

> Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 11:11:37 -0400
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> Cc: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>, gdb@sourceware.org
> 
> On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 06:24:14AM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > I still have the issues with file names reported here:
> > 
> >   http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2009-03/msg00618.html
> > 
> > I take it that the silence means everyone agrees with the renaming?
> > If so, I will give it a go in a day or two.
> 
> We import these files from gnulib.  Any time we import them, they'll
> get the same names.

Can't the import script rename them?

> Maybe you could raise this problem with the gnulib developers?

I don't think I stand a chance, unless GDB as a project will ask for
that.