From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10315 invoked by alias); 18 Nov 2005 22:33:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 10301 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Nov 2005 22:33:37 -0000 Received: from romy.inter.net.il (HELO romy.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.66) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 22:33:37 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-84-228-164-161.inter.net.il [84.228.164.161]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.8-GR) with ESMTP id CZU19716 (AUTH halo1); Sat, 19 Nov 2005 00:33:33 +0200 (IST) Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 22:33:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: gdb@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <20051118214620.GA19194@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Fri, 18 Nov 2005 16:46:20 -0500) Subject: Re: Maintainer policy for GDB Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20051117044801.GA4705@nevyn.them.org> <8f2776cb0511162240q6f550008udda9803b5253fd88@mail.gmail.com> <20051118030711.GB31581@nevyn.them.org> <20051118152618.GB9100@nevyn.them.org> <20051118185135.GA13986@nevyn.them.org> <20051118214620.GA19194@nevyn.them.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2005-11/txt/msg00411.txt.bz2 > Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 16:46:20 -0500 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > Cc: Ian Lance Taylor , gdb@sourceware.org > > Here's the counter question: if we force people to take the > responsibility, why will they do a good job? I wasn't suggesting to force a responsibility. And we cannot enforce it, anyway, under your suggestions, since being authorized means to have the same rights with less duties. We all are busy people, so it's quite possible we will wind up with several authorized maintainers and no responsible maintainers.