From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13104 invoked by alias); 1 Aug 2008 15:23:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 13095 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Aug 2008 15:23:42 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtaout2.012.net.il (HELO mtaout2.012.net.il) (84.95.2.4) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 15:23:22 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.228.238]) by i_mtaout2.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) with ESMTPA id <0K4X00A9RHF53231@i_mtaout2.012.net.il> for gdb@sources.redhat.com; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 18:23:30 +0300 (IDT) Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 15:23:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: Move GDB to C++ ? In-reply-to: <20080801142048.GA18215@caradoc.them.org> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: vladimir@codesourcery.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: References: <487658F7.1090508@earthlink.net> <20080801131312.GA14712@caradoc.them.org> <20080801142048.GA18215@caradoc.them.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-08/txt/msg00018.txt.bz2 > Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2008 10:20:48 -0400 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > Cc: vladimir@codesourcery.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com > > On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 04:46:25PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > The idea is that a maintainer cannot behave with the code as he > > pleases, claiming that it's his time and therefore his, and only his, > > business. > > So this is an objection to the refactoring, not to how Vladimir spends > his time working on GDB. There were no references to refactoring in the paragraph you cited. FWIW, it was a general concern, not something I concocted to justify my more specific objections.