From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: "Dave Korn" <dave.korn@artimi.com>
Cc: msnyder@redhat.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com,
jrydberg@virtutech.com, fche@redhat.com,
brolley@redhat.com, ebachalo@redhat.com
Subject: Re: Return to Reverse Execution
Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2006 14:09:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <uoe2ph2iq.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <SERRANOe4t1wGFLMzN700000257@SERRANO.CAM.ARTIMI.COM> (dave.korn@artimi.com)
> From: "Dave Korn" <dave.korn@artimi.com>
> Cc: <msnyder@redhat.com>, <gdb@sources.redhat.com>, <jrydberg@virtutech.com>, <fche@redhat.com>, <brolley@redhat.com>, <ebachalo@redhat.com>
> Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 12:29:16 -0000
>
> I _know_ you suggested a different prefix.
>
> And the reason *why* you suggested it, according to how I read your post, is
> because the meaning of "reverse" would be unclear as to whether it always
> meant the backwards direction, or whether it would swap directions if the
> exec-direction flag swapped value, and you are concerned that this might be a
> source of confusion, and you feel that the particular naming scheme you
> suggest would clear up the confusion.
No, I suggested to use ``backwards'' because it is unambiguous even if
there's no flag.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-06 14:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-04 21:01 Michael Snyder
2006-01-05 5:04 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-01-06 4:28 ` Michael Snyder
2006-01-06 9:02 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-01-06 15:19 ` Paul Koning
2006-01-13 16:02 ` Bob Rossi
2006-01-13 19:43 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-01-06 10:30 ` Dave Korn
2006-01-06 11:17 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-01-06 12:29 ` Dave Korn
2006-01-06 14:09 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2006-01-06 14:12 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-01-06 16:59 ` Dave Brolley
2006-01-06 19:57 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-01-06 21:51 ` Paul Gilliam
2006-01-06 21:53 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-01-06 22:05 ` Paul Gilliam
2006-01-09 8:41 ` Vladimir Prus
2006-05-16 20:24 ` Julian Smith
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=uoe2ph2iq.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=brolley@redhat.com \
--cc=dave.korn@artimi.com \
--cc=ebachalo@redhat.com \
--cc=fche@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=jrydberg@virtutech.com \
--cc=msnyder@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox