From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1667 invoked by alias); 6 Jan 2006 14:12:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 1660 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Jan 2006 14:12:22 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from romy.inter.net.il (HELO romy.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.66) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 Jan 2006 14:12:21 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-198-24.inter.net.il [80.230.198.24]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) with ESMTP id DHY89968 (AUTH halo1); Fri, 6 Jan 2006 16:12:08 +0200 (IST) Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2006 14:12:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: "Dave Korn" CC: msnyder@redhat.com, gdb@sources.redhat.com, jrydberg@virtutech.com, fche@redhat.com, brolley@redhat.com, ebachalo@redhat.com In-reply-to: (dave.korn@artimi.com) Subject: Re: Return to Reverse Execution Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-01/txt/msg00038.txt.bz2 > From: "Dave Korn" > Cc: , > , > , > , > , > > Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 12:29:16 -0000 > > Because I believe the *main* issue should not be finicky details of > command-naming conventions, but the serious structural issues of > implementation and internals design. I agree that design and coding are more important, but that doesn't mean that a good intuitive UI is entirely unimportant. I think Michael did right when he decided to discuss the user interface in advance of coding, and I wanted to contribute to that effort as much as I could. I feel quite strongly about the naming issues, even though it might not show in my language.