From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-27496-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 19250 invoked by alias); 13 Jan 2007 21:16:03 -0000
Received: (qmail 19242 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Jan 2007 21:16:03 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from romy.inter.net.il (HELO romy.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.66)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 21:15:58 +0000
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-84-229-119-34.inter.net.il [84.229.119.34]) 	by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) 	with ESMTP id GUU86122 (AUTH halo1); 	Sat, 13 Jan 2007 23:15:51 +0200 (IST)
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 21:16:00 -0000
Message-Id: <umz4mhblk.fsf@gnu.org>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
CC: uweigand@de.ibm.com, mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl, gdb@sourceware.org
In-reply-to: <20070113192252.GA653@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel 	Jacobowitz on Sat, 13 Jan 2007 14:22:52 -0500)
Subject: Re: bigcore.exp on 64-bit systems
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
References: <200701131450.l0DEoWpP029656@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <200701131831.l0DIVZWE032470@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> <20070113192252.GA653@nevyn.them.org>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2007-01/txt/msg00244.txt.bz2

> Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 14:22:52 -0500
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> Cc: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>, eliz@gnu.org,
> 	gdb@sourceware.org
> 
> For comparison purposes, an 8GB limit on my system completes the core
> dump in 1.6 seconds.

Yep, that works for me on fencepost as well.  Even 256GB works and
finishes in reasonable time.