From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15385 invoked by alias); 23 Feb 2008 11:13:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 15376 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Feb 2008 11:13:27 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nitzan.inter.net.il (HELO nitzan.inter.net.il) (213.8.233.22) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 23 Feb 2008 11:13:01 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-84-228-4-117.inter.net.il [84.228.4.117]) by nitzan.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3a-GA) with ESMTP id JGR13667 (AUTH halo1); Sat, 23 Feb 2008 13:10:30 +0200 (IST) Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 11:15:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Alp=E1r_J=FCttner?= CC: gdb@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <1203724876.4440.70.camel@piko.site> (message from =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Alp=E1r_J=FCttner?= on Sat, 23 Feb 2008 01:01:16 +0100) Subject: Re: New MI maintainer Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <18363.14758.855327.355215@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <20080220190512.4550A8FC6D@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <18364.37907.135913.269853@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <18366.14530.875406.113087@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <47BF0478.1050209@ix.netcom.com> <20080222220927.GA21434@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <20080222222124.GH26716@brasko.net> <007a01c875ab$aae85770$2e08a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> <1203724876.4440.70.camel@piko.site> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-02/txt/msg00202.txt.bz2 > From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Alp=E1r_J=FCttner?= > Cc: gdb@sourceware.org > Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 01:01:16 +0100 > > I think, the real issue is not the openness of the project management, > but this: > > > Given that I have made significant contributions > > to GDB/MI over a long period of time then it would then seem appropriate to at > > least e-mail me off-list before the announcement to inform me of your > > intention. > > As far as I see, nobody has commented on this sentence of Nick. Actually, that's not true. Daniel did respond: > > Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 20:41:47 -0500 > > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > > Cc: gdb@sourceware.org, Richard Stallman > > > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 09:46:04AM +1300, Nick Roberts wrote: > > > was interested in the role. Given that I have made significant contributions > > > to GDB/MI over a long period of time then it would then seem appropriate to at > > > least e-mail me off-list before the announcement to inform me of your > > > intention. > > > > Yes. I didn't handle the announcement well, and I should have avoided > > the (untrue) appearance of conflict of interest by asking someone else > > to make the announcement. I think that's an appropriate response. > Some people expected an apology in this thread but nobody seemed to be > thinking about whether he should apologize. More than one person made a > mistake in this awkward story. I strongly believe that a frank 'sorry' > from the one who made the first one would be followed by others. I think the above comes as close to "sorry" as one can expect in such situations.