Mirror of the gdb mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Vladimir Prus <ghost@cs.msu.su>
Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: Multithreaded debugging: strange thread switches
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 21:21:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ulkx5fj4q.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200601241741.45231.ghost@cs.msu.su> (message from Vladimir Prus 	on Tue, 24 Jan 2006 17:41:44 +0300)

> From: Vladimir Prus <ghost@cs.msu.su>
> Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 17:41:44 +0300
> 
> > > Hmmm, maybe that's a sign that Changelog requirements are suboptimal?
> > > Most often, Changelog entries contain lots of details about
> > > changes to specific functions, but no general overview of the goal of the
> > > patch.
> >
> > No, the mailing list archives are where this sort of thing is supposed
> > to live 
> 
> But if I'm looking at Changelog entry, how can I guess the subject of email 
> that discusses this change?

You can't.  The way to look is to search for relevant keywords and for
symbols from the sources in question.

> > - and the comments in the code.   
> 
> But if change is across 10 files, a comment in one of them is not likely to 
> give the entire pictire.

The entire picture should be either in one of the source files, the
one that has the bulk of the related code, or in gdbint.texinfo.

I know that in practice much of such info is just nowhere, but
ChangeLog is no place for it, either.  The way to make sure the big
picture is not lost is to make a point of explaining it in one of the
two places I mentioned when you submit a patch.  I always ask people
to add information to gdbint.texinfo, but of course much is still left
unexplained.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-01-24 21:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-01-23 15:46 Vladimir Prus
2006-01-23 16:02 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-01-24 14:28   ` Vladimir Prus
2006-01-24 14:41     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-01-24 14:44       ` Vladimir Prus
2006-01-24 16:16         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2006-01-24 21:21         ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2006-01-25  0:04   ` vCont [was Re: Multithreaded debugging: strange thread switches] Nathan J. Williams
2006-01-25 11:20     ` Daniel Jacobowitz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ulkx5fj4q.fsf@gnu.org \
    --to=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=ghost@cs.msu.su \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox