From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4159 invoked by alias); 10 Feb 2006 11:54:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 4151 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Feb 2006 11:54:09 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from romy.inter.net.il (HELO romy.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.66) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 11:54:08 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-84-228-136-147.inter.net.il [84.228.136.147]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) with ESMTP id DNR70406 (AUTH halo1); Fri, 10 Feb 2006 13:54:05 +0200 (IST) Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 11:54:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: Vladimir Prus CC: gdb@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: (message from Vladimir Prus on Fri, 10 Feb 2006 14:35:08 +0300) Subject: Re: MI error messages Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-02/txt/msg00074.txt.bz2 > From: Vladimir Prus > Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 14:35:08 +0300 > > 1. Is it guaranteed that all MI error message start with function name and a > semicolon? I see a small number of error messages that don't, but those are probably bugs that need to be fixed.