From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-26762-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 28283 invoked by alias); 2 Nov 2006 04:23:28 -0000
Received: (qmail 28275 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Nov 2006 04:23:26 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from romy.inter.net.il (HELO romy.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.66)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Nov 2006 04:23:25 +0000
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-84-229-216-252.inter.net.il [84.229.216.252]) 	by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) 	with ESMTP id GDL94257 (AUTH halo1); 	Thu, 2 Nov 2006 06:23:12 +0200 (IST)
Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2006 04:23:00 -0000
Message-Id: <ulkmu5vez.fsf@gnu.org>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
CC: mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl, gdb@sourceware.org
In-reply-to: <20061101230623.GA26112@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel 	Jacobowitz on Wed, 1 Nov 2006 18:06:23 -0500)
Subject: Re: [rfc] "reset" / "create-inferior" commands
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
References: <20061101202811.GA20484@nevyn.them.org> <200611012255.kA1Mtnq5021717@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20061101230623.GA26112@nevyn.them.org>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2006-11/txt/msg00007.txt.bz2

> Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 18:06:23 -0500
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> Cc: gdb@sourceware.org
> 
> Mark, Eli, how do you feel about using both "restart" and "setup"? 
> While they're the same action in GDB internals, I think they're
> different actions from the user's point of view.

"setup" is too general, IMO.

OTOH, I have no problems with "create-process" or "create-inferior" or
"init-inferior" or "reinit-inferior".