From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Vladimir Prus <ghost@cs.msu.su>
Cc: jrydberg@virtutech.com, drow@false.org, gdb@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: read watchpoints ignored?
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 04:01:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <uhdaeimpv.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200511141642.22179.ghost@cs.msu.su> (message from Vladimir Prus on Mon, 14 Nov 2005 16:42:20 +0300)
> From: Vladimir Prus <ghost@cs.msu.su>
> Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 16:42:20 +0300
> Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>,
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>,
> gdb@sources.redhat.com
>
> This essentially disables read watchpoints. What's the point in first
> implementing read watchpoints in a target, and then disabling them completely
> in gdb?
I agree, this is not a good solution.
> I don't yet have specific *real-world* examples, but using "is the value
> different from the value last time we stopped" as a heuristic to decide if we
> hit write watchpoint or read watchpoint seems fragile.
It is a vast improvement on what we had before.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-15 4:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-11 13:22 Vladimir Prus
2005-11-11 18:19 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-11-13 16:45 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-11-13 22:38 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-11-14 2:43 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-11-14 4:38 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-11-14 14:42 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-11-15 4:02 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-11-14 10:10 ` Vladimir Prus
2005-11-14 14:41 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-11-14 14:45 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2005-11-15 4:02 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-11-14 13:16 ` Johan Rydberg
2005-11-14 13:42 ` Vladimir Prus
2005-11-14 13:59 ` Johan Rydberg
2005-11-14 14:10 ` Vladimir Prus
2005-11-15 4:01 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=uhdaeimpv.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=drow@false.org \
--cc=gdb@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=ghost@cs.msu.su \
--cc=jrydberg@virtutech.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox