From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-23361-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 9483 invoked by alias); 19 Nov 2005 22:55:49 -0000
Received: (qmail 9475 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Nov 2005 22:55:49 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from nitzan.inter.net.il (HELO nitzan.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.20)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 22:55:48 +0000
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-83-130-247-65.inter.net.il [83.130.247.65]) 	by nitzan.inter.net.il (MOS 3.6.5-GR) 	with ESMTP id BZC62393 (AUTH halo1); 	Sun, 20 Nov 2005 00:55:41 +0200 (IST)
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 22:55:00 -0000
Message-Id: <uhda8fdsc.fsf@gnu.org>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: gdb@sourceware.org
In-reply-to: <20051119222130.GA13034@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> (message from 	Christopher Faylor on Sat, 19 Nov 2005 17:21:30 -0500)
Subject: Re: Maintainer policy for GDB
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
References: <20051117044801.GA4705@nevyn.them.org> <20051117231020.GJ1635@adacore.com> <ubr0i5dve.fsf@gnu.org> <200511180956.14917.pgilliam@us.ibm.com> <u64qpiz95.fsf@gnu.org> <20051119024455.GA6482@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <ufypshpn2.fsf@gnu.org> <20051119170458.GB7912@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <upsowfmve.fsf@gnu.org> <20051119222130.GA13034@trixie.casa.cgf.cx>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2005-11/txt/msg00431.txt.bz2

> Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 17:21:30 -0500
> From: Christopher Faylor <me@cgf.cx>
> 
> Again, this is not a foolproof way of figuring out if someone is not
> subscribed but it should be a foolproof way of figuring out if someone
> is subscribed, i.e., if you see the header then the sender is definitely
> subscribed.  If you don't see the header then the person may or may not
> be subscribed, depending on how they sent the software.

Well, if a large fraction of subscribers don't get this header, it's
not very useful.

> That said, however, I just modified the software to check the header from
> as well as the envelope sender.  Maybe this email will show up with the
> X-IsSubscribed header set.

Hope this will now catch most of the guilty parties ;-)