From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-23638-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 19932 invoked by alias); 6 Dec 2005 22:32:01 -0000
Received: (qmail 19925 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Dec 2005 22:32:00 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from gandalf.inter.net.il (HELO gandalf.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.17)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 22:31:58 +0000
Received: from nitzan.inter.net.il (nitzan.inter.net.il [192.114.186.20]) 	by gandalf.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.1-GA) 	with ESMTP id HEM04978; 	Wed, 7 Dec 2005 00:31:54 +0200 (IST)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-205-88.inter.net.il [80.230.205.88]) 	by nitzan.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.2-GA) 	with ESMTP id CDI00033 (AUTH halo1); 	Wed, 7 Dec 2005 00:31:50 +0200 (IST)
Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 22:32:00 -0000
Message-Id: <uhd9lluw2.fsf@gnu.org>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: gdb@sourceware.org
In-reply-to: <20051206210900.GA10747@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel 	Jacobowitz on Tue, 6 Dec 2005 16:09:00 -0500)
Subject: Re: Filename with "./" in breakpoint command
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
References: <dms4je$qit$1@sea.gmane.org> <u4q5qs1rq.fsf@gnu.org> <200512050953.01350.ghost@cs.msu.su> <uk6ej9ymu.fsf@gnu.org> <20051205185556.GA9808@nevyn.them.org> <uek4qalza.fsf@gnu.org> <20051206045518.GA23837@nevyn.them.org> <uwtiikmty.fsf@gnu.org> <20051206201719.GA9140@nevyn.them.org> <uk6eikkgz.fsf@gnu.org> <20051206210900.GA10747@nevyn.them.org>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2005-12/txt/msg00066.txt.bz2

> Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 16:09:00 -0500
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> 
> On Tue, Dec 06, 2005 at 11:02:20PM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > > Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 15:17:19 -0500
> > > From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> > > 
> > > > I'd prefer to have a better solution to the original problem.
> > > 
> > > We do; use full pathnames.
> > 
> > I thought Vladimir didn't like it (and neither do I, frankly).
> 
> What else is there?  Not a rhetorical question, I just don't see any
> alternative.

You suggested one alternative: to put a breakpoint in all matching
file names.

> For a user typing "break foo.c:54" we've already agreed on a more
> useful behavior

That's the alternative I was talking about.