From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7689 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2005 19:22:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 7680 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Nov 2005 19:22:47 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from romy.inter.net.il (HELO romy.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.66) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sun, 27 Nov 2005 19:22:45 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-31-154.inter.net.il [80.230.31.154]) by romy.inter.net.il (MOS 3.5.8-GR) with ESMTP id DBJ75416 (AUTH halo1); Sun, 27 Nov 2005 21:22:39 +0200 (IST) Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 08:51:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: gdb@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <20051127050014.GA2984@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Sun, 27 Nov 2005 00:00:14 -0500) Subject: Re: Maintainer policy for GDB Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20051125030605.GA20073@nevyn.them.org> <20051125052810.GA23958@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> <20051125160454.GB29028@nevyn.them.org> <20051125204347.GA7107@nevyn.them.org> <20051125213849.GA8364@nevyn.them.org> <20051127050014.GA2984@nevyn.them.org> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2005-11/txt/msg00598.txt.bz2 > Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2005 00:00:14 -0500 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > Cc: gdb@sourceware.org > > I never wanted a promise that the review of anything would be > _finished_ within the timeout; I realize I may have been unclear about > that. I did want it to _start_, however - feedback on the patch from > someone who could approve or reject it, even if they did neither. > > Having a week ACK and a month for the actual review is fine with me. > It meets my primary goal: clear signs of progress, or a clear path > forward if no signs of progress are seen. And I still mean "the start > of the review", within that month. Then we are very close to an agreement. Could you perhaps post a revised wording for MAINTAINERS, based on the discussions until now? > It's my goal to find something that we're all minimally reluctant about > :-) And everybody else's, I presume. Thanks.