From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1980 invoked by alias); 31 Jul 2008 18:43:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 1972 invoked by uid 22791); 31 Jul 2008 18:42:59 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtaout2.012.net.il (HELO mtaout2.012.net.il) (84.95.2.4) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 18:42:36 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.229.228.238]) by i_mtaout2.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2004.12) with ESMTPA id <0K4V00DNGVYZKOK1@i_mtaout2.012.net.il> for gdb@sources.redhat.com; Thu, 31 Jul 2008 21:42:42 +0300 (IDT) Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 20:00:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: Move GDB to C++ ? In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il To: Vladimir Prus Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: References: <487658F7.1090508@earthlink.net> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-07/txt/msg00352.txt.bz2 > From: Vladimir Prus > Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 10:10:37 +0400 > > I think this discussion went a bit wrong way -- trying to convince folks that > *investing effort* in converting to C++ is justified. However, I don't think > the proposal is about making folks not interested in C++ doing any work -- the > proposal is about allowing folks who do some specific work, and want to make > use of additional features C++ provides, to use those features, while not imposing > significant problems on the rest of contributors. Your being busy refactoring does impose a significant problem on me. We are members of the same team, so how you use your time while on the team is important to me.