From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5730 invoked by alias); 20 Feb 2006 20:56:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 5721 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Feb 2006 20:56:07 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from gandalf.inter.net.il (HELO gandalf.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 20 Feb 2006 20:56:06 +0000 Received: from nitzan.inter.net.il (nitzan.inter.net.il [192.114.186.20]) by gandalf.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.1-GA) with ESMTP id HYA18938; Mon, 20 Feb 2006 22:55:47 +0200 (IST) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-84-228-239-249.inter.net.il [84.228.239.249]) by nitzan.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) with ESMTP id CTD92330 (AUTH halo1); Mon, 20 Feb 2006 22:55:41 +0200 (IST) Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 23:37:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: Vladimir Prus CC: bob@brasko.net, gdb@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <200602201023.05756.ghost@cs.msu.su> (message from Vladimir Prus on Mon, 20 Feb 2006 10:23:04 +0300) Subject: Re: MI: type prefixes for values Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <20060217193558.GD14873@brasko.net> <200602201023.05756.ghost@cs.msu.su> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-02/txt/msg00275.txt.bz2 > From: Vladimir Prus > Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 10:23:04 +0300 > Cc: Eli Zaretskii , > gdb@sources.redhat.com > > To make an even more specific question, I propose to: > > - Remove type prefix from output of -data-evaluate-expression and > -var-evaluat-expression > > - Add 'type' field to the output of -data-evaluate-expression > > > Is this OK with everyone? I think a better suggestion surfaced in this discussion: don't try to parse the output of -data-evaluate-expression, and use -var-create instead. Is that good enough? If not, why not?