From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20242 invoked by alias); 21 Oct 2005 14:54:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 20232 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Oct 2005 14:54:00 -0000 Received: from nitzan.inter.net.il (HELO nitzan.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.20) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 14:54:00 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-159-89.inter.net.il [80.230.159.89]) by nitzan.inter.net.il (MOS 3.6.5-GR) with ESMTP id BTE94861 (AUTH halo1); Fri, 21 Oct 2005 16:53:49 +0200 (IST) Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 14:54:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: Andrew STUBBS CC: gdb@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <4358FA2C.9030803@st.com> (message from Andrew STUBBS on Fri, 21 Oct 2005 15:24:44 +0100) Subject: Re: RFC: GDB as a loader 1/3: silent batch mode Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <4354DBFF.7000601@st.com> <4358FA2C.9030803@st.com> X-SW-Source: 2005-10/txt/msg00122.txt.bz2 > Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 15:24:44 +0100 > From: Andrew STUBBS > Cc: gdb@sources.redhat.com > > I don't appear to be getting much feedback on these things. Is there > anybody in particular I could point them at? There's nobody stands out > in the MAINTAINERS file for these things. Any global maintainer can approve this, I think. I suggest to wait for a week, and if no one responds, see it as approved by me. > I would like to get these ideas incorporated, but right now I'm feeling > a little ignored. Maybe I'm just too used to instant gratification. People travel, get away of their mail, and otherwise engage in the rest of their lives. (I just returned from a 2-week travel during which I didn't read my mail at all.) Please be a little more patient.