From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5614 invoked by alias); 9 Nov 2006 04:22:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 5603 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Nov 2006 04:22:18 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nitzan.inter.net.il (HELO nitzan.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.20) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Nov 2006 04:22:11 +0000 Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([81.5.46.239]) by nitzan.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3a-GA) with ESMTP id FDB75219 (AUTH halo1); Thu, 9 Nov 2006 06:22:06 +0200 (IST) Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2006 04:22:00 -0000 Message-Id: From: Eli Zaretskii To: pedro_alves@portugalmail.pt, drow@false.org, gdb@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <20061108183936.GA21403@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> (message from Christopher Faylor on Wed, 8 Nov 2006 13:39:36 -0500) Subject: Re: [RFC] MinGW and i386_pe_skip_trampoline_code Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <455125A3.30304@portugalmail.pt> <20061108015752.GA4565@nevyn.them.org> <20061108183936.GA21403@trixie.casa.cgf.cx> X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2006-11/txt/msg00043.txt.bz2 > Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 13:39:36 -0500 > From: Christopher Faylor > > > >Yes, you are right. I'm not one of the ``MinGW people'' who maintain > >the native GDB, but I've seen the patches, and they aren't in the > >official sources, for reasons that evade me. > > Isn't the ownership of the patches questionable so there is no clear way > to assign them to the FSF? Maybe, I simply don't know.