From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-23325-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 3248 invoked by alias); 18 Nov 2005 18:11:03 -0000
Received: (qmail 3232 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Nov 2005 18:11:00 -0000
Received: from nitzan.inter.net.il (HELO nitzan.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.20)
    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Nov 2005 18:11:00 +0000
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-84-228-161-34.inter.net.il [84.228.161.34])
	by nitzan.inter.net.il (MOS 3.6.5-GR)
	with ESMTP id BYZ11075 (AUTH halo1);
	Fri, 18 Nov 2005 20:10:20 +0200 (IST)
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 18:11:00 -0000
Message-Id: <ubr0hj08f.fsf@gnu.org>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: gdb@sourceware.org, Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>, cagney@gnu.org,
        jtc@acorntoolworks.com, fnf@ninemoons.com,
        Peter.Schauer@regent.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de, ezannoni@redhat.com
CC: gdb@sourceware.org
In-reply-to: <20051118150536.GA9100@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel
	Jacobowitz on Fri, 18 Nov 2005 10:05:37 -0500)
Subject: Re: Maintainer policy for GDB
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
References: <20051117044801.GA4705@nevyn.them.org> <20051117231020.GJ1635@adacore.com> <ubr0i5dve.fsf@gnu.org> <20051118150536.GA9100@nevyn.them.org>
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2005-11/txt/msg00395.txt.bz2

> Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2005 10:05:37 -0500
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> Cc: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>, cagney@gnu.org,
> 	jtc@acorntoolworks.com, fnf@ninemoons.com,
> 	Peter.Schauer@regent.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de, ezannoni@redhat.com
> 
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 02:39:33PM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Since Daniel sets up his mailer to prevent replies getting to him by
> > direct email,
> 
> Huh?

I mean the Mail-Followup-To header.  Remember that conversation we had
in private about it?

> > I find it ironic, to say the least, that he forces us to
> > get the same message twice.
> 
> If you feel "forced" or offended, I will make a note never to CC you
> and a list again.

I'm sorry my innocent remark causes such over-reaction.  All I did was
ask a question.  I put it in parentheses to show that it's neither
very important nor directly relevant to the main discussion.  Then
people asked me why I said that, and I explained.  No offense intended
or taken.

> I'm sorry you found my attempt to be helpful to be annoying instead.

I said ``ironic'', not annoying.