From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-return-24345-listarch-gdb=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 22987 invoked by alias); 17 Feb 2006 20:05:04 -0000
Received: (qmail 22970 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Feb 2006 20:05:03 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from gandalf.inter.net.il (HELO gandalf.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.17)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Feb 2006 20:04:19 +0000
Received: from nitzan.inter.net.il (nitzan.inter.net.il [192.114.186.20]) 	by gandalf.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.1-GA) 	with ESMTP id HXH03932; 	Fri, 17 Feb 2006 22:04:06 +0200 (IST)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 (IGLD-80-230-152-98.inter.net.il [80.230.152.98]) 	by nitzan.inter.net.il (MOS 3.7.3-GA) 	with ESMTP id CSO04092 (AUTH halo1); 	Fri, 17 Feb 2006 22:04:05 +0200 (IST)
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 20:07:00 -0000
Message-Id: <ubqx5hhvm.fsf@gnu.org>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Vladimir Prus <ghost@cs.msu.su>, gdb@sources.redhat.com
In-reply-to: <20060217195909.GA19387@brasko.net> (message from Bob Rossi on 	Fri, 17 Feb 2006 14:59:09 -0500)
Subject: Re: MI: type prefixes for values
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
References: <dt43qh$sns$1@sea.gmane.org> <200602171658.23427.ghost@cs.msu.su> <ur762gjo3.fsf@gnu.org> <200602171724.03824.ghost@cs.msu.su> <upsllhkv6.fsf@gnu.org> <20060217190418.GA27304@nevyn.them.org> <uoe15hjnt.fsf@gnu.org> <20060217193556.GA28754@nevyn.them.org> <uirrdhiep.fsf@gnu.org> <20060217195909.GA19387@brasko.net>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2006-02/txt/msg00205.txt.bz2

> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 14:59:09 -0500
> From: Bob Rossi <bob@brasko.net>
> Cc: Vladimir Prus <ghost@cs.msu.su>, gdb@sources.redhat.com
> 
> > MI should have a regular syntax which allows such a spec.  If MI
> > doesn't support that, then it misses its main design goal.
> 
> I completly disagree. MI has a design spec that allows a FE to parse the
> output of GDB. The data that it get's back from GDB is a whole different
> story.

Data is just one part of the output of GDB, so it should be parsable
like the rest, IMO.